Synchronization of Periodic Clocks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a programming model dedicated to real-time videostreaming applications for embedded media devices, including highdefinition TVs. This model is built on the synchronous programming model extended with domain-specific knowledge — periodic evolution of streams — to allow correct-by-construction properties of the application to be proven by the compiler. These properties include buffer requirements and delays between input and output streams. Such properties are tedious to analyze by hand, due to the combinatorics of video filters, multiple data rates and formats. We show how to extend a core synchronous data-flow language with a notion of periodic clocks, and to design a relaxed clock calculus (a type system for clocks) to allow non strictly synchronous processes to be composed. This relaxation is associated with a subtyping rule in the clock calculus. Delay, buffer insertion and control code for these buffers are automatically inferred from the clock types through a systematic program transformation. Categories and Subject Descriptors C.3 [Special-purpose and application-based systems]: Real-time and embedded systems; D.3.2 [Language classifications]: Data-flow languages
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".