MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297873745 · doi:10.5957/smc-2022-108

Assessing Polar Class Ship Overload and Ice Impact on Low-ice Class Vessels using a “Quasi Real Time” Popov/Daley Approach

2022· article· en· W4297873745 on OpenAlexaff
Sthéfano Lande Andrade, Ahmed Elruby, Dan Oldford, Bruce Quinton

Bibliographic record

VenueSNAME Maritime Convention · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinetic energyIndentationDeformation (meteorology)Work (physics)PolarEnergy (signal processing)Class (philosophy)GeologyMechanicsComputer scienceMeteorologyEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsClassical mechanicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The methodology presented in this work considers an impact’s available kinetic energy as balanced by the ice crushing energy as well as the structural deformation energy. The algorithm re-calculates the kinetic energy iteratively by subtracting the energy lost to structural deformation and ice crushing at specified time-intervals. The updated kinetic energy is then used to determine the current impact speed, which controls the indentation rate of ice on the structure. The result is a contactless ice load model which is intrinsically coupled to structural deformation. Accounting for structural deformation energy is important for overload of Polar Class ships, as well as any ice impact for non-ice class ships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSNAME Maritime ConventionSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207