Canadian aging and inactivity study: Spaceflight-inspired exercises during head-down tilt bedrest blunted reductions in muscle-pump but not cardiac baroreflex in older persons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of the first Canadian aging and inactivity study (CAIS) we assessed the efficacy of space-based exercise countermeasures for maintenance of cardiac and muscle-pump baroreflex in older persons during bedrest. An initiative of the Canadian Space Agency, Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canadian Frailty Network, CAIS involved 14 days of 6-degree head-down tilt bedrest (HDBR) with (Exercise) or without (Control) combined upper and lower body strength, aerobic, and high-intensity interval training exercise countermeasures. Twenty healthy men and women aged 55 to 65, randomly divided into control and exercise groups (male control (MC, n = 5), male exercise (ME, n = 5), female control (FC, n = 6), female exercise (FE, n = 4)) (age: 58.7 ± 0.5 years, height: 1.67 ± 0.02 m, body mass: 70.2 ± 3.2 kg; mean ± SEM), completed the study. Cardiac and muscle-pump baroreflex activity were assessed with supine-to-stand tests. Wavelet transform coherence was used to characterise cardiac and muscle-pump baroreflex fraction time active (FTA) and gain values, and convergent cross-mapping was used to investigate causal directionality between blood pressure (BP) and heart rate, as well as BP and lower leg muscle electromyography (EMG). Seven of the twenty participants were unable to stand for 6 minutes after HDBR, with six of those being female. Our findings showed that 2 weeks of bedrest impaired skeletal muscle’s ability to return blood to the venous circulation differently across various sexes and intervention groups. Comparing values after bed rest with before bed rest values, there was a significant increase in heart rates (∆ of +25%; +17% in MC to +33% in FC; p < 0.0001), beat-to-beat EMG decreased (∆ of −43%; −25% in ME to −58% in MC; p < 0.02), while BP change was dependent on sex and intervention groups. Unlike their male counterparts, in terms of muscle-pump baroreflex, female participants had considerably decreased FTA after HDBR (p < 0.01). All groups except female control demonstrated parallel decreases in cardiac active gain and causality, while the FC demonstrated an increase in cardiac causality despite a similar decline in cardiac active gain. Results showed that the proposed exercises may alleviate muscle-pump baroreflex declines but could not influence the cardiac baroreflex decline from 14 days of inactivity in older adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".