MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297882624 · doi:10.1145/3492866.3561253

Hivemind

2022· article· en· W4297882624 on OpenAlexaff
Wonjung Kim, Seung‐Chul Lee, Youngjae Chang, Taegyeong Lee, Seongwoong Kang, Inseok Hwang, Junehwa Song

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGreen IT and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic spaceSpace (punctuation)Variety (cybernetics)Mode (computer interface)DemocracyComputer scienceInternet privacyComputer securityBusinessTelecommunicationsArchitectural engineeringPublic relationsEngineeringPolitical scienceHuman–computer interactionLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Public spaces1 are a basis of urban lives. The mode and culture of sharing could be an indicator of the quality of life in the cities. For example, the buses and restaurants should comfort and bring satisfaction to individual visitors, including the vulnerable with special needs. However, their operation mostly occurs in rather a closed and exclusive manner [2]. An inherent limitation to such an inclusive sharing lies in the exclusive modes of traditional device interfaces; a variety of devices, called public devices hereafter, are installed in the public space and determine operational details of the space. As such, the space itself is shared, however, the public devices are controlled in exclusive ways. Could the sharing of the public space be operated in a democratic way?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.145
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreen IT and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207