MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297887327 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/3xvad

Konsep Tawakal Al-Ghazali

2022· preprint· id· W4297887327 on OpenAlex
Annisa Nurul Huda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesia adalah negara dengan potensi tinggi terjadi bencana. Letak geografis dan struktur topografis Indonesia merupakan faktor utama terjadinya bencana tersebut. Dampak yang diakibatkan oleh bencana alam begitu banyak, mulai dari kehilangan kerabat dekat, tempat tinggal, dan harta benda. Hal-hal inilah yang menimbulkan stress, ketakutan, gelisah, insomnia, hingga meerasa bahwa dirinya tidak berguna, bahkan putus asa, jika pada diri seseorang ditemukan hal-hal diatas maka itulah yang disebut penderita trauma psikologis. Pada kasus seperti ini Medis bukanlah jalan keluar yang tepat, karna obat-obatan hanya meredakan bukan mengobati, dan sifatnya sementara. Maka Psikologi Islam hadir memberikan solusi dengan menanamkan sifat Tawakkal dalam perspektif al-Ghazali yang mana menurutnya dengan Tawakkal mampu membawa manusia mencapai ma’rifatullah, hingga ia menyandarkan segala sesuatu kepadaNya.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslamic Studies and RadicalismFrench-language works237,207