MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297891184 · doi:10.47176/mjiri.36.66

Comparison of Postural Control of Females with and without Urinary Incontinence: A Case-Control Study

2022· article· en· W4297891184 on OpenAlexaff
Leila Alizadeh, Afsaneh Nikjooy, Behnoosh Vasaghi‐Gharamaleki, Reza Salehi, Ali Ahmadzadeh Amiri, Hamed Ghomashchi, Saman Salehi, Khaled Rezaie

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrinary incontinenceMedicineForce platformCenter of pressure (fluid mechanics)Sample entropyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMathematicsUrologyStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

↑What is "already known" in this topic:Human balance can be affected through the impairment of any one of the sensorimotor systems.Appropriate function of these systems to maintain an ideal balance is crucial.Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common disorder among females.So far, there is much less information about the effects of urinary incontinence on postural control. →What this article adds:Our results revealed there were statistical differences between the females with and without SUI in the linear parameters of COP trajectories.Additionally, in the full bladder condition, the SUI group experienced more challenges in postural control.While the non-linear analysis of COP time-series showed no significant difference between the two groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Journal of the Islamic Republic of IranSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207