MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4297909245

Clinical and dopplerographic characteristics of headache at men and women with discirculatory encephalopathy

2012· article· en· W4297909245 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yakovlev N.A., Abramenko U.V., Slyusar T.A.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEncephalopathyPsychologyPediatricsPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of the research was the comparative analysis of headache clinical implications and ultrasonographic characteristics at women and men with dyscirculatory encephalopathy (DE). 72 women (middle age 64.3) and 48 men with dyscirculatory encephalopathy (DE) of l-ll stage comparable to their age (middle age 65.0) have been examined. The examinations were organized using diagnostic criteria of the International classification of headache disorders (ICDH — II, 2003), headache diary and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Headache intensity was estimated bythe Visual Analog Scale. Cerebral hemodynamics changes were examined by means of duplex ultrasound of cerebral great vessels and transcranial duplex scanning. The comparative analysis revealed the predomination of tension-type headache among women with DE. They also surpassed men-patients in the indicators of headache intensity, attack duration and frequency. With the help of transcranial duplex scanning (TCDS)was revealed that women with headache were characterized by more severe abnormal venous outflow from the brain. The received data may be important for individualiza-tion of therapeutic approaches at men and women with headache and DE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.542
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMigraine and Headache Studies→French-language works237,207→