MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297914360

Paysage et développement territorial : potentialités et exigences des démarches participatives

2008· preprint· fr· W4297914360 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Josée Fortin, A.S. Devanne, Sophie Le Floch

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2008
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCitizen journalismEnvironmental planningGeographyWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

/ Les démarches participatives sont considérées comme susceptibles d'apporter des contributions originales pour articuler paysage et développement. Or, elles demeurent souvent au stade expérimental. A partir de l'exemple du développement de l'énergie éolienne, les auteurs avancent l'idée que la dimension politique du paysage, de plus en plus reconnue, suscite aussi des craintes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsFrench-language works237,207