La qualité dans les projets de développement durable, entre conceptions moderne et relationnelle : le cas du "paysage" dans le développement éolien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quality is a concern for human societies when they think and manage their living environment. This paper discusses the idea that the notion of aesthetic quality would actually go through a redefinition. Quality would no more be strictly defined as a property of an object and / or a subject, as understood in the Cartesian paradigm. Under the influence of a relational thought of thinking, it would be defined as a characteristic of the relationships that humans tie among each others as well as with their living environment. In order to illustrate this idea, we will use social debates arising around wind farms projects, usually presented as sustainable development strategies. We will take a closer look at the aesthetic quality of these emerging landscapes, an important theme of the debates. At first, we will bring up the idea that there is a «material violence» inherent in the object of the wind tower that shakes the principles of action traditionally used in landscape work. The notion de «co-visibility» will then be use to illustrate emerging practices. Finally, we will discuss new ways by which private and public actors are now considering their roles in the planning of such major projects. / La qualité est une préoccupation des sociétés humaines lorsqu'elles pensent et aménagent leur environnement terrestre. Ce texte discute l'idée selon laquelle la notion de qualité, dans sa déclinaison esthétique, serait en cours de redéfinition. La qualité ne serait plus strictement considérée comme une propriété d'un objet et / ou d'un sujet, tel qu'entendu dans le paradigme cartésien. Sous l'influence d'un mode de pensée relationnel, elle serait de plus en plus conçue comme une propriété des relations que les hommes nouent simultanément entre eux et avec leur environnement. Nous prendrons comme exemple les contestations sociales accompagnant l'expansion de la filière énergétique éolienne, présentée comme stratégie de développement durable. Plus précisément, nous nous intéresserons à la qualité esthétique des paysages, un thème central de ces contestations. Dans une première partie, nous avancerons l'idée qu'il y a une « violence matérielle » de l'objet éolienne qui ébranle les principes de l'action paysagère classique. Nous nous arrêterons ensuite sur la notion de «co-visibilité» pour illustrer les nouvelles pratiques qui se construisent. Enfin, nous examinerons la façon dont les acteurs privés et publics reconsidèrent leurs rôles en aménagement et en développement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".