MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297916405 · doi:10.2118/210048-ms

Formation Failure Analysis for Longitudinally Fractured Horizontal Wells Completed by Multistage Fracturing Sleeves

2022· article· en· W4297916405 on OpenAlexaff
Kenji Furui, Junjing Zhang, Nola R. Zwarich, E. R. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeotechnical engineeringBoreholeFracture (geology)Finite element methodInflowHydraulic fracturingStress (linguistics)Drawdown (hydrology)DrillingFlow (mathematics)Compression (physics)Petroleum engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringAquiferStructural engineeringGroundwaterMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study reviewed the formation failure analysis of horizontal wells completed with both cemented and uncemented multistage fracturing sleeves to evaluate the risk of sand production and formation failure in a sandstone and mudstone interbedded reservoir. Consequently, the effects of increased confining stresses caused by fracture creation and proppant placement inside a hydraulically created longitudinal fracture were investigated. In addition, a parametric study was performed for different types of fracturing sleeves to determine the optimum flow port designs for reducing the formation failure potential. A 3D elastoplastic finite element method (FEM) model was developed for horizontal wells completed using fracturing sleeves. Reservoir rock constitutive model was obtained through several triaxial compression tests performed on the reservoir cores. The FEM model considered various loading steps, including in-situ stress, overbalanced drilling, fracture creation, reservoir depletion, and drawdown during production. Moreover, the onset of formation failure was judged based on the critical plastic strain determined from the triaxial compression test data and compared for different fracture and sleeve designs. The formation failure potential of a horizontal borehole with various completion designs was evaluated through a case study. A significant reduction in potential of formation failure for cased hole completions was observed, and the maximum allowed reservoir pressure depletion before formation failure depended on the rock strength, direction of reservoir inflow, drawdown pressure, and other factors. Similar to the oriented perforation design, the flow port location significantly affected the stability of the formation in the vicinity of the sleeve. The flow ports located in the upward and downward directions delayed the onset of formation failure, while closely spaced flow ports covering the entire circumference of the wellbore substantially increased the formation failure potential. Further, excessive stress increases caused by fracturing and proppant placement resulted in large shear stress and resultant plastic strain development at the connection between the longitudinal fracture and borehole. Openhole completions where the fracture is misaligned with the wellbore have the same risk of formation failure at the flow port as that of the cemented sleeve completions. Moreover, there is an additional risk of formation failure of the uncemented wellbore. In the idealistic case, wherein the fracture is completely aligned with the wellbore, large plastic strains develop at the sidewalls of the horizontal openhole wellbore. The difference in the formation failure tendency between the cased hole and openhole completions may affect post-failure well productivity, depending on the type of debris after failure and its size relative to the sleeve port size. The results presented in this work demonstrate that the onset of formation failure is mainly determined by rock strength, reservoir pressure support, drawdown pressure, completion design and other factors. Cemented frac sleeve completion is necessary when the wellbore is widely exposed to weak, water-sensitive formations, which tend to fail during the early flowback period. Further, in openhole completions, the weak intervals must be mechanically isolated such that the failed rock debris in the annulus between the open hole and production liner does not plug the sleeve ports. In addition, the formation failure potential was elevated owing to the longitudinal fracture creation along the wellbore. The findings from this study provide critical inputs for optimizing lower-completion designs and achieving long-term solid-free production in fractured horizontal wells in moderately consolidated sandstone reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207