Abstract P239: Angiotensin II-Induced Memory Gamma Delta T Cells Sensitize Mice To A Mild Hypertensive Stimulus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that memory γδ T cells form after a hypertensive challenge, and that they sensitize mice to develop hypertension to mild hypertensive stimuli. Methods: Ten-12-week-old C57BL/6J mice were exposed or not to a pressor dose of angiotensin II (490 ng/kg/min, SC) for two weeks, followed by a two-week washout period, and then infused with a subpressor dose of angiotensin II (140 ng/kg/min, SC) for two weeks. Blood pressure (BP) was measured by telemetry and memory γδ T cells profiled by flow cytometry. A subset of mice was injected IP with 400 μg of anti-T cell receptor γδ-depleting or isotype control antibodies 1 day before and 6 days after the initiation of second hypertensive challenge. A final subset was injected IV with 2.5x10 5 γδ T cells isolated from hypertensive or normotensive mice, and then exposed to a subpressor dose of angiotensin II as above. Results: Repeated hypertensive challenges yielded a higher systolic BP than one mild hypertensive stimulus (154±4 vs 120±3 mm Hg, P <0.01). Two-week pressor dose angiotensin II increased effector memory γδ T cells in mesenteric artery perivascular adipose tissue (1.25±0.37% vs. 0.24±0.12%, P<0.05) and mesenteric lymph nodes (1.49±0.03% vs 0.82±0.15%, P<0.05). γδ T cell depletion reduced systolic BP elevation from day 8 (135±5 vs 150±5 mm Hg, P <0.05) to day 13 of the second hypertensive challenge (150±5 vs 163±2 mm Hg, P <0.05). Adoptive transfer of γδ T cells isolated from hypertensive compared to normotensive mice caused a greater systolic BP elevation in response to a subpressor dose of angiotensin II (159±3 vs 142±6 mm Hg, P <0.01). Conclusion: Memory γδ T cells develop after a hypertensive challenge and sensitize mice to mild hypertensive stimuli. Memory γδ T cells may represent a novel therapeutic target to treat hypertensive humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".