MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297956901 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1109.4626

Tail bounds for the height and width of a random tree with a given\n degree sequence

2011· preprint· W4297956901 on OpenAlexaff
Louigi Addario‐Berry

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2011
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicStochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsExponentMathematicsSequence (biology)Degree (music)Tree (set theory)Order (exchange)Plane (geometry)Discrete mathematicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fix a sequence c=(c_1,...,c_n) of non-negative integers with sum n-1. We say\na rooted tree T has child sequence c if it is possible to order the nodes of T\nas v_1,...,v_n so that for each 1 <= i <= n, v_i has exactly c_i children. Let\nT be a plane tree drawn uniformly at random from among all plane trees with\nchild sequence c. In this note we prove sub-Gaussian tail bounds on the height\n(greatest depth of any node) and width (greatest number of nodes at any single\ndepth) of T. These bounds are optimal up to the constant in the exponent when c\nsatisfies c_1^2+...+c_n^2=O(n); the latter can be viewed as a "finite variance"\ncondition for the child sequence.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.019 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsFrench-language works237,207