MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297980812 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2018.0019

Crown Jewel Wilderness: Creating North Cascades National Park by Lauren Danner

2018· article· en· W4297980812 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildernessContext (archaeology)Art historyHistoryLibrary scienceSociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

442 OHQ vol. 119, no. 3 degree. (He is a journalism graduate of the University of Washington.) He asks the questions a person outside the scientific community would ask, provides the answers in understandable prose, and writes about people as much as science. One of those people was Harold McCluskey, who had survived “the biggest internal dose of radiation of any surviving nuclear worker in history.” He described McCluskey, home after four years of treatment, as “defiantly upbeat” (p. 58). More than a few of Williams’s science stories intersect with history: bringing irrigation to the Columbia Basin Project in Washington; drowning of Celilo Falls by The Dalles Dam; “oracle bones” in a museum in Taipei, Taiwan; and the replacement of staffed lighthouses along the Pacific Ocean with automated lights. Williams places all these stories in the context of their times. His writing is matter-of-fact, but he tucks in bits of information that bring an era or an area to life. This book has a little something for every reader, from scientists who are featured in much of the book to casual readers who like good stories. Williams had a reputation as a solid, accurate reporter when he was a journalist writing “the first draft of history.” This personal review of his life and work is a worthy second draft. Roberta Ulrich Beaverton, Oregon CROWN JEWEL WILDERNESS: CREATING NORTH CASCADES NATIONAL PARK by Lauren Danner Washington State University Press, Pullman, 2017. Illustrations, notes, bibliography, index. 326 pages. $29.95, paper. To all who have laid eyes on its regal peaks and deep green valleys, North Cascades National Park (NCNP) is a stunning piece of scenery. Along the Pacific Slope of the United States, the sublimity of its natural beauty is rivaled only by Washington State’s two other national parks: Olympic and Mount Rainier. If you were to ask anyone in Seattle with a pair of hiking boots, they probably would assume that preserving North Cascades was a no-brainer. But in Crown Jewel Wilderness, Lauren Danner digs into the region’s history and reveals the prolonged contention that prevented the park’s establishment until 1968. With an impressive grasp of the nuances of federal land-use classifications as well as deep knowledge of the finer points of mid-century conservationism, she demonstrates how a generation of proposals, negotiations, and compromises spawned one of the most complex land management arrangements in the West, comprising national forests, national recreation areas, wilderness areas, and one spectacular “jewel” of a national park along the Canadian border. Danner builds on a robust body of historical literature that tells a tale of bureaucratic enmity between the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service. The story will be familiar to anyone who has watched Ken Burns’s popular PBS series, The National Parks: America’s Best Idea. The narrative typically begins, as Danner does in the first chapter, with differences of ideology between Gifford Pinchot and John Muir. It becomes more complicated with the rise of the automobile and the concerns of nascent wilderness preservationists like Aldo Leopold and Bob Marshall. And then, after World War II, it simultaneously fractures and explodes, with the agencies coming to function as pawns among private interests, public pressures, and well-organized grassroots organizations. In a 1989 essay, historian Hal Rothman described the inter-agency rivalry as a “regular ding-dong fight,” quoting sources from the 1930s to describe “squabbles” that “often seemed petty, motivated by little more than bureaucratic intransigence and a degree of territoriality rivaled only by medieval despots” (“‘A Regular Ding Dong Fight’” Western Historical Quarterly, Summer 1989). Danner carries Rothman ’s analysis into the mid twentieth century and adds evidence to support the argument that his conclusions apply to the postwar era, albeit in distinctive forms. But, for as well-researched and thoroughly retold as it is, Crown Jewel Wilderness is less driven by scholarly argument than it is by Danner’s pure passion for wilderness and the 443 Book Notes mountains themselves. At best, this results in a rich, if not incomplete, story of the region during the twentieth century. At worst, it obscures the author’s most important findings. In...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it