MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4297980812 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2018.0019

Crown Jewel Wilderness: Creating North Cascades National Park by Lauren Danner

2018· article· en· W4297980812 sur OpenAlex
Taylor E. Rose

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWildernessContext (archaeology)Art historyHistoryLibrary scienceSociologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

442 OHQ vol. 119, no. 3 degree. (He is a journalism graduate of the University of Washington.) He asks the questions a person outside the scientific community would ask, provides the answers in understandable prose, and writes about people as much as science. One of those people was Harold McCluskey, who had survived “the biggest internal dose of radiation of any surviving nuclear worker in history.” He described McCluskey, home after four years of treatment, as “defiantly upbeat” (p. 58). More than a few of Williams’s science stories intersect with history: bringing irrigation to the Columbia Basin Project in Washington; drowning of Celilo Falls by The Dalles Dam; “oracle bones” in a museum in Taipei, Taiwan; and the replacement of staffed lighthouses along the Pacific Ocean with automated lights. Williams places all these stories in the context of their times. His writing is matter-of-fact, but he tucks in bits of information that bring an era or an area to life. This book has a little something for every reader, from scientists who are featured in much of the book to casual readers who like good stories. Williams had a reputation as a solid, accurate reporter when he was a journalist writing “the first draft of history.” This personal review of his life and work is a worthy second draft. Roberta Ulrich Beaverton, Oregon CROWN JEWEL WILDERNESS: CREATING NORTH CASCADES NATIONAL PARK by Lauren Danner Washington State University Press, Pullman, 2017. Illustrations, notes, bibliography, index. 326 pages. $29.95, paper. To all who have laid eyes on its regal peaks and deep green valleys, North Cascades National Park (NCNP) is a stunning piece of scenery. Along the Pacific Slope of the United States, the sublimity of its natural beauty is rivaled only by Washington State’s two other national parks: Olympic and Mount Rainier. If you were to ask anyone in Seattle with a pair of hiking boots, they probably would assume that preserving North Cascades was a no-brainer. But in Crown Jewel Wilderness, Lauren Danner digs into the region’s history and reveals the prolonged contention that prevented the park’s establishment until 1968. With an impressive grasp of the nuances of federal land-use classifications as well as deep knowledge of the finer points of mid-century conservationism, she demonstrates how a generation of proposals, negotiations, and compromises spawned one of the most complex land management arrangements in the West, comprising national forests, national recreation areas, wilderness areas, and one spectacular “jewel” of a national park along the Canadian border. Danner builds on a robust body of historical literature that tells a tale of bureaucratic enmity between the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service. The story will be familiar to anyone who has watched Ken Burns’s popular PBS series, The National Parks: America’s Best Idea. The narrative typically begins, as Danner does in the first chapter, with differences of ideology between Gifford Pinchot and John Muir. It becomes more complicated with the rise of the automobile and the concerns of nascent wilderness preservationists like Aldo Leopold and Bob Marshall. And then, after World War II, it simultaneously fractures and explodes, with the agencies coming to function as pawns among private interests, public pressures, and well-organized grassroots organizations. In a 1989 essay, historian Hal Rothman described the inter-agency rivalry as a “regular ding-dong fight,” quoting sources from the 1930s to describe “squabbles” that “often seemed petty, motivated by little more than bureaucratic intransigence and a degree of territoriality rivaled only by medieval despots” (“‘A Regular Ding Dong Fight’” Western Historical Quarterly, Summer 1989). Danner carries Rothman ’s analysis into the mid twentieth century and adds evidence to support the argument that his conclusions apply to the postwar era, albeit in distinctive forms. But, for as well-researched and thoroughly retold as it is, Crown Jewel Wilderness is less driven by scholarly argument than it is by Danner’s pure passion for wilderness and the 443 Book Notes mountains themselves. At best, this results in a rich, if not incomplete, story of the region during the twentieth century. At worst, it obscures the author’s most important findings. In...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,200
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle