MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297989768 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000201477

Status Migrainosus

2022· editorial· en· W4297989768 on OpenAlexaff
Serena L. Orr

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMigraineMedicineDiseasePublic healthPediatricsPsychiatryInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migraine is the second most common and disabling disease worldwide,1 and some of the associated disability can be attributed to complications of the disease. Status migrainosus, whereby an attack exceeds 72 hours in duration,2 is a complication of migraine that has historically been very understudied. It is unclear how common it is, given limited data, but the few existing prevalence studies have estimated that anywhere from 3% to 20% of people with migraine may experience status migrainosus.3-5 What little evidence is available suggests that it is a considerable public health problem; it is associated with significant disability,5 and people with status migrainosus have a worse migraine prognosis5 and a higher risk of suicide6 when compared with people with migraine who do not experience status migrainosus. People with status migrainosus are also frequently hospitalized for management,4,5 and admissions are incredibly costly, with estimates varying between ∼USD $3,800 and 7,000 per admission.7,8 Unfortunately, existing inpatient therapies have very low levels of evidence to support their use and may have low efficacy rates.9

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0110.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207