MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297990442 · doi:10.18280/ria.360413

Severity Classification of Alzheimer Dementia Based on MRI Images Using Deep Neural Network

2022· article· en· W4297990442 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nofitasari Dwi Rezeki, Suci Aulia, Sugondo Hadiyoso

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaConvolutional neural networkAlzheimer's diseaseCognitive impairmentClinical diagnosisArtificial intelligenceDiseaseArtificial neural networkMedicineCognitionPsychologyComputer sciencePsychiatryPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is the most common type of dementia, usually characterized by memory loss followed by progressive cognitive decline and functional impairment. AD is one of the leading causes of death and cannot be cured, but proper medical treatment can delay the severity of the disease. Early detection of AD can detect early and prevent the disease from getting worse. So, we need a system that can detect AD as a means of support for the clinical diagnosis. In this study, a system was designed to classify the severity of AD using the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method with VGG-16 and VGG-19 modeling. From the simulation results with a total of 4,160 MRI datasets, the highest accuracy rate was 98.28% with VGG-19 architecture using Adam's Optimizer for the classification of 3 classes, namely no dementia (normal), mild dementia, and moderate dementia. It is hoped that this study can support clinical diagnosis in assessing the severity of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207