Movimiento feminista y economía social en Quebec: paradigmas y prácticas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las mujeres son muy activas en la economía social y solidaria en Quebec tanto en la base de las cooperativas y ONG como en su liderazgo. Sin embargo, las consideraciones relativas a la igualdad de género en estas organizaciones son objeto de un nutrido debate. El artículo presentará un análisis de esta problemática a partir de datos de 2000 y 2008 en siete regiones de Quebec. Se plantean tensiones relativas al financiamiento, a las prácticas, y también a la ideología y al discurso -miedo al feminismo, auge de una cultura empresarial en las ONG, cooperativas e instituciones-. De este modo se pueden identificar empíricamente los límites al modelo teórico contemporáneo de la economía social y solidaria. Dichos límites serán analizados para permitir la concepción de nuevas políticas de inserción que incorporen las preocupaciones relativas a la igualdad de género en el ámbito de las organizaciones y de los proyectos de economía solidaria.AbstractWomen are very active in Social and Solidary Economy in Québec, both at the lower levels of cooperatives and NGO’s and among the leading positions. However, the topic about equality of gender in these organizations is at the moment being debated. The article presents a discussion of the problem based on data from 2000 and 2008 in seven regions in Québec. Tensions related to funding, practices and also to ideology and discourse-fear towards feminism, the rise of an entrepreneurial culture in NGO, co-operatives and institutions are stated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".