Smart Traffic Management System for Metropolitan Cities of Kingdom Using Cutting Edge Technologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The expansion of technology in metropolitan centers draws people to cities, which causes excessive traffic on the roadways during peak hours. This exacerbated the traffic situation, resulting in a delay, a loss of resources, and a waste of time. Like any other metropolitan metropolis, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, has everyday traffic congestion during business hours. The current traffic management has made many attempts to ease traffic congestion in cities; despite these measures, the problem has not been solved adequately. To handle this road congestion, there is a need to appropriately store the big data collected by traffic sensors and utilize it for efficient traffic management employing cutting-edge technology. This study provides an architecture for a smart traffic management system that uses modern technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, 5G, and big data to aid conventional traffic management systems and efficiently handle the stated problem. The proposed technique has the potential to reduce traffic congestion significantly. Our proposed solution encourages mobility by using roadside messaging agents to offer real-time traffic information on traffic congestion and unexpected traffic incidents. Citizens will save time by getting these early warning messages, particularly during peak hours. As part of the suggested method, each signal dashboard gets traffic information. A case study is used in the research to evaluate alternative solutions to traffic congestion. The case study results show that the proposed strategy outperforms the present options.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".