The role of vibrations for reducing the resistance in the relative movement of parallel plates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of surface vibrations on the propulsion augmentation and resistance in the relative movement of parallel plates has been studied. The analysis was focused on monochromatic waves and laminar flows. The effectiveness of the vibrations was gauged by determining the external force required to maintain the movement of one of the plates at a prescribed velocity. It is shown that waves propagating upstream always increase the resistance but the flow response to waves propagating downstream is more intricate and is a function of the flow Reynolds number. In general, waves must be sufficiently fast to reduce the flow resistance. This leads to a natural division between slow and fast waves; a characterization that is helpful for flows at a sufficiently small Reynolds number Re . An increase in Re brings into play the complication of possible resonances with the natural flow frequencies. Resonances are not possible with waves faster than the plate velocity and these supercritical waves generally decrease the flow resistance. More complex flow responses can occur with slower (subcritical) waves which tend to increase the flow resistance. A complete elimination of the resistance is possible if the waves are of sufficiently short wavelength and travel quickly. This suggests that our mechanism has great potential in the development of propulsion augmentation systems. None of the waves produced net energy savings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".