MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298005457 · doi:10.1080/09518398.2022.2127030

Queering Disciplinary Languages: A Critical Orientation to Languages in Mathematics Education

2022· article· en· W4298005457 on OpenAlexaff
Miwa Aoki Takeuchi, Luis A. Leyva

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Studies in Language
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisciplineSociologyOrientation (vector space)Mathematics educationPedagogyPsychologyMathematicsSocial scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How do you tame a wild tongue, train it to be quiet, how do you bridle and saddle it? How do you make it lie down?—Gloria AnzaldúaLanguages in disciplinary learning spaces, such as the learning of ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0270.061
Scholarly communication0.0180.020
Open science0.0030.018
Research integrity0.0040.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.607
Teacher spread0.455 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in EducationSame topicGender Studies in LanguageFrench-language works237,207