MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298006801 · doi:10.4000/communication.16160

Ella MINGAZOVA, Bruno DUPONT et Carole GUESSE (dir.) (2022), Obsolescence programmée. Perspectives culturelles

2022· article· fr· W4298006801 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
François-Xavier Surinx

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObsolescencePhilosophyArtHumanitiesBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce collectif regroupe plusieurs chapitres faisant suite à un colloque ayant eu lieu à l’Université de Liège en 2016. L’ouvrage adopte une démarche originale en proposant d’observer le concept d’obsolescence programmée dans une perspective pluridisciplinaire ancrée en sciences humaines (notamment la psychologie, la philosophie et les études littéraires et artistiques, mais aussi, plus singulièrement, l’architecture), alors que, depuis son apparition il y a bientôt un siècle, la notion a surto...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207