MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4298006804 · doi:10.3917/nresi.094.0011

Ce que nous dit Patrick Fougeyrollas de l’autodétermination

2022· article· fr· W4298006804 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Fougeyrollas

Bibliographic record

Venue˜La œNouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives/˜La œNouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente, dans une perspective anthropologique socio-historique, la résurgence actuelle du Mouvement de vie autonome fondé, dès les années 1970, sur l’autodétermination, l’entraide par les pairs et l’autogestion sur le mode coopératif d’adultes en hébergement de longue durée ou à risque d’y être orientés. La création de la coopérative Coop-Assist à Québec, ses actions directes et ses négociations, pendant la pandémie de la Covid 19, avec le Gouvernement du Québec visent le développement de l’Assistance personnelle autodirigée (APA). Sur une base de financement public, ce nouveau programme s’avérerait moins coûteux que l’hébergement institutionnel mais avec une gouvernance indépendante par les pairs autodéterminés. Le cadre d’analyse s’appuie sur le Modèle de développement humain-Processus de production du handicap (MDH-PPH) et les principes de la Convention relative aux droits des personnes handicapées de l’ONU.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.015
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜La œNouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives/˜La œNouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→