MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298009678 · doi:10.18280/ts.390429

Medical Signal Processing via Digital Filter and Transmission Reception Using Cognitive Radio Technology

2022· article· en· W4298009678 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Premkumar, S. Sathiyapriya, M. Arun, Vikash Sachan

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNoise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Filter (signal processing)Transmission (telecommunications)Electronic engineeringAnalog signalSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research paper provides a viable solution for processing noise affected Electrocardiogram (ECG) signal via digital filter and transmission of ECG signal and reception via cognitive radio (CR) technology. Health assessment signals such as ECG signal, Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal, Electromyogram (EMG) signal are vital for diagnosis and rehabilitation of human welfare among which ECG attains prime importance due to its information on heart functioning. However, electrocardiogram signals are prone to addition of noise such as power line noise 50 Hz mainly due to improper shielding which can lead to wrong interpretation, incorrect diagnosis and at times will eventually lead to loss of human life. On combining signal processing into medical applications misconceptions can be eliminated and diagnosis can be done effectively through a designed digital filter. Effect of noise can be cancelled in an ECG signal and by using cognitive radio technology ECG information can be transmitted to a medical physician mobile terminal for remedial measures relating to medical treatment. Simulation results are shown in matrix laboratory (MATLAB) for cancelling noise in an ECG signal having noise using a digital filter which is designed represented by its transfer function. Also, ECG signal is transmitted and received in a CR system where the metric of probability of error is obtained which can be useful for signal processing fraternity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207