MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298011592

Expressing Access Control Policies with an Event-Based Approach

2010· article· en· W4298011592 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Konopacki, Marc Frappier, Régine Laleau

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAccess Control and Trust
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvent (particle physics)Control (management)Computer scienceAccess controlComputer securityArtificial intelligencePhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce EB3SEC. This language is used to express access control policies in information systems. Permissions and prohibitions are expressed with a class diagram. EB3SEC also includes a process algebra. This process algebra allows one to express specific constraints over permissions and prohibitions. Organizational constraints such as obligation and separation of duty are also supported by process algebra. Separation of duty constraints can be expressed at a workflow process level. Standards such as RBAC or OrBAC can be used to express the access control policy, but their derivatives can also be used. EB3SEC provide a formal language with a high level of expressiveness to describe access control policies.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicAccess Control and TrustFrench-language works237,207