Les temporalités frontalières et urbaines du port de Strasbourg : Analyse géohistorique d'une relation fluviale ville-port
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'éclairage géohistorique de la relation ville-port à Strasbourg implique un croisement de deux chronologies, l'une géopolitique, liée à une position frontalière évolutive, l'autre économique et générale articulée à l'histoire portuaire dans une perspective plus résolument urbaine de la déconnection-reconnexion des deux espaces fonctionnels. Dans cette logique, l'analyse suivie envisagera alternativement l'évolution de la fonction portuaire de Strasbourg dans une situation d'instabilité frontalière, pour considérer ensuite la manière dont l'espace portuaire participe au projet urbain. Ces deux approches permettront par ailleurs d'envisager l'analyse à deux échelles géographiques, celle de l'espace régional et celle de l'aménagement urbain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".