MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298038717 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1010.4612

Recovering Compressively Sampled Signals Using Partial Support\n Information

2010· preprint· W4298038717 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael P. Friedlander, Hassan Mansour, Rayan Saab, Özgür Yılmaz

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2010
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMinificationCompressed sensingSignal reconstructionSIGNAL (programming language)Noise (video)AlgorithmSignal recoveryMathematicsCompressibilityComputer scienceSignal processingMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)TelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we study recovery conditions of weighted $\\ell_1$ minimization\nfor signal reconstruction from compressed sensing measurements when partial\nsupport information is available. We show that if at least 50% of the (partial)\nsupport information is accurate, then weighted $\\ell_1$ minimization is stable\nand robust under weaker conditions than the analogous conditions for standard\n$\\ell_1$ minimization. Moreover, weighted $\\ell_1$ minimization provides better\nbounds on the reconstruction error in terms of the measurement noise and the\ncompressibility of the signal to be recovered. We illustrate our results with\nextensive numerical experiments on synthetic data and real audio and video\nsignals.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207