MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The biochemical genetics of rudimentary mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

2009· article· en· W4298046565 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Søren Nørby

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditas · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsWelch Foundation
KeywordsBiologyAspartate carbamoyltransferaseDrosophila melanogasterLocus (genetics)MutantGeneticsCarbamoyl phosphate synthetaseEnzymePyrimidine metabolismWild typeUracilStrain (injury)BiochemistryGeneDNAAnatomyAllosteric regulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aspartate carbamoyltransferase (ACT) levels were determined in larvae from two completely complementing and one non-complementing rudimentary strain, as well as in wild-type larvae. The levels were low in the non-complementing and in one of the complementing strains, whereas the other complementing strain had wild-type levels. When viewed together with the previous findings of a nutritional requirement for pyrimidines in the non-complementing strain, that can be satisfied by carbamoyl aspartate, these results indicate that the rudimentary locus determines the first two enzyme activities in the pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway; carbamoyl phosphate synthetase and aspartate carbamoyltransferase. Addition of uracil to the culture medium caused no decrease in the level of ACT in wild type or ACT-positive rudimentary larvae indicating that end product repression of this enzyme does not take place in Drosophila.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHereditasSame topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207