MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Unified Gait Phase Estimation and Control of Exoskeleton using Virtual Energy Regulator (VER)

2022· article· en· W4298088283 on OpenAlexafffund
Rezvan Nasiri, Hannah Dinovitzer, Arash Arami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsExoskeletonGaitController (irrigation)Work (physics)Computer scienceGait analysisSimulationKnee JointControl theory (sociology)EngineeringPhysical medicine and rehabilitationArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virtual Energy Regulator (VER) is a time independent controller that can generate stable limit cycles in lower-limb exoskeleton devices. In this work, we apply VER to control a lower-limb exoskeleton for assistive walking. We design two different limit cycles for hip and knee joints to assist the user during overground walking with the Indego explorer lower-limb exoskeleton. We tested the designed VER on a single participant for overground walking at a self-selected speed. Interestingly, due to VER time-independent nature, it can properly coordinate with the user’s motions and produce mechanically stable overground walking in which the user can walk overground without a walker or crutches. The resultant gait is also more similar to a normal gait with improved range of motion compared to cases without controller; range of motion improved from $42.9 \pm 4.8{deg}$ and $44.9 \pm 4.9 {deg}$ to $46.6 \pm 1.3 {deg}$ and $63.0 \pm 6.8 {deg}$ at hip and knee joints, respectively. Especially, for the knee joint, the user is able to fully extend her knee during stance phase only when the VER is in the loop. In VER, the radius of each desired limit cycle is a function of phase. Accordingly, during walking, the internal phase of the VER is a monotonically increasing parameter that can be considered as a candidate for real-time gait phase estimation and heel-strike event detection. Hence, for gait phase estimation, VER relies only on a single joint position provided by the exoskeleton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207