A Holistic Reading of The Streetscape and Building Articulation: The Case of The Canadian City of Halifax
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Streetscape provide a conceptual framework for guiding sustainable urban space improvements. Building forms form refers to architecture that is the height of buildings, the articulation of their form, and the quality of their materials and construction. Building form is also primarily concerned with the character, shape, scale, and design of buildings. While the study provides a holistic view of the streets of Halifax city, it includes the evaluation of the articulation created by the coming together of the buildings and the physical and perceptual components affecting the public interfaces examined on the examples. For this purpose, the study is examined under two headings as the streetscape and building articulation. As part of the holistic evaluation of the buildings in the study, the use of materials, entrances, roof ends of the buildings, signs and wall-paintings on the buildings, awnings and canopies on the facades of the buildings is examined. As part of the holistic evaluation of the streets, design of building-street interface, building orientation and settlement, type of building uses, pedestrian walkways are examined. At the end of the study showed that design principles and harmony with each other of the buildings that determine the street boundaries guides the shaping of the city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".