MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298122443 · doi:10.5507/sth.2022.033

Suggestions for Refining Theological Terminology in Slovak: Part III

2022· article· en· W4298122443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia theologica · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlovakTerminologyRefining (metallurgy)PhilosophyLinguisticsMetallurgyMaterials scienceCzech

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are words in the Catholic doctrine where the meaning is not unambiguous, but ambiguous or polysemous. Ideally, there should be more monosemic and less polysemic expressions. This cannot be prevented in many cases. There are several options, however, where ambiguity or polysemy can be eliminated. This may help to refine Catholic doctrine. The aim of my study is not the pastoral aspect as a matter of priority, consisting in the gradual introduction of new terms into homilies, catechisms or prayer books, but a theological view, whereby the task is to argue from the aspect of the content of the doctrine and correctness of the Slovak language. This viewpoint should help those in charge of the Church to consider the validity of these suggestions and, accordingly, apply at least some of them in pastoral and liturgical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it