MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298126384 · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01008

Ultracompact Silicon-On-Insulator Couplers for Multicore Fibers

2022· article· en· W4298126384 on OpenAlexaff
Julián L. Pita, Lucas G. Rocha, Jun Yang, Şükrü Ekin Kocabaş, Ming-Jun Li, Ivan Aldaya, Michaël Ménard, Paulo Dainese, Lucas H. Gabrielli

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Photonics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsFootprintMulti-core processorTaperingSilicon on insulatorChipTopology (electrical circuits)Coupling (piping)Electronic engineeringOptoelectronicsComputer scienceMaterials scienceSiliconElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber-to-chip couplers are critical devices to support interconnections between fibers and photonic integrated circuits. The advent of spatial division multiplexing (SDM) systems based on multicore fibers makes these devices subject to increasingly demanding footprint and coupling requirements. In addition to size and efficiency requirements, the manufacturing constraints and large parameter space result in a challenging optimization problem. This article applies topology optimization to design three integrated couplers for multicore fibers with an intercore spacing of 32 μm. By individually optimizing the radiating and tapering regions, we design and experimentally demonstrate two devices: the first with perpendicular coupling and an efficiency of −3.8 dB, with a footprint of 15 μm × 10 μm, and the second with a 10° coupling angle and an efficiency of −2.9 dB, with a footprint of 20 μm × 10 μm. Furthermore, by applying topology optimization over the whole design region, we improved the simulated efficiency to −1.9 dB within a footprint of only 10 μm × 10 μm, which represent the most compact CMOS-compatible coupler to date with efficiency among the highest in class. These are the first devices that can enable direct coupling between silicon chips and multicore fibers with intercore separation below 25 μm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS PhotonicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207