MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4298130074 · doi:10.1117/12.2632313

Phase change reconfigurable grating couplers with ultrahigh modulation contrast

2022· article· en· W4298130074 on OpenAlexaff
Avik Mandal, Rachel Ellis, Behrad Gholipour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGratingModulation (music)OpticsHigh contrastContrast (vision)Phase modulationMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsPhase noiseAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon photonics has matured over the last decade as a unique platform for highly miniaturized photonic integrated systems seamlessly integrated with electronics allowing the realization and commercialization of highly compact devices with ultrafast data transfer rates and significantly reduced power consumption. Although such submicron scale photonic and waveguide structures enable dense on-chip device integration, they also result in reduced efficiency in fiber-to-waveguide coupling mainly due to increased mode area mismatch. As a result, one of the key challenges faced in current technology platforms has been to efficiently couple light without additional fabrication, post-processing, and complex optical alignment. In-plane grating couplers (GC) have been a widely preferred coupling platform, mainly because of low fabrication costs, ease of alignment and high-level of flexibility in circuit design. A wide range of coupling platform designs have been investigated in the last decade including both passive and active designs. In passive design the coupling efficiency (CE) is fixed once the device is fabricated, however in active designs various tuning mechanism have been explored to modulate the CE, but at the expense of increased power consumption and reduced CE. Using inverse design techniques, we demonstrate CMOS compatible, reconfigurable phase change chalcogenide-on-insulator based apodised GC having maximized CE of more than 50% at λ=1550nm when the phase of the chalcogenide is in amorphous state. When the phase is switched to crystalline state, a near zero CE is shown allowing the design to be both non-volatile and reversibly reconfigurable with highest transmission modulation contrast of more than 50db.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→