MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298141614 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.994480

Distinct spatial distribution and roles of Kupffer cells and monocyte-derived macrophages in mouse acute liver injury

2022· article· en· W4298141614 on OpenAlexafffund
Manuel Flores Molina, Mohamed N. Abdelnabi, Sabrina Mazouz, Deborah Villafranca‐Baughman, Vincent Quoc‐Huy Trinh, Shafi Muhammad, Nathalie Bédard, David Osorio Laverde, Ghada S. Hassan, Adriana Di Polo, Naglaa H. Shoukry

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Liver FoundationPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsMonocyteKupffer cellLiver injuryMacrophageCell biologyDistribution (mathematics)ImmunologyBiologyPathologyMedicineIn vitroEndocrinologyBiochemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Macrophages are key regulators of inflammation and repair, but their heterogeneity and multiple roles in the liver are not fully understood. We aimed herein to map the intrahepatic macrophage populations and their function(s) during acute liver injury. We used flow cytometry, gene expression analysis, multiplex-immunofluorescence, 3D-reconstruction, and spatial image analysis to characterize the intrahepatic immune landscape in mice post-CCl4-induced acute liver injury during three distinct phases: necroinflammation, and early and late repair. We observed hepatocellular necrosis and a reduction in liver resident lymphocytes during necroinflammation accompanied by the infiltration of circulating myeloid cells and upregulation of inflammatory cytokines. These parameters returned to baseline levels during the repair phase while pro-repair chemokines were upregulated. We identified resident CLEC4F+ Kupffer cells (KCs) and infiltrating IBA1+CLEC4F- monocyte-derived macrophages (MoMFs) as the main hepatic macrophage populations during this response to injury. While occupying most of the necrotic area, KCs and MoMFs exhibited distinctive kinetics, distribution and morphology at the site of injury. The necroinflammation phase was characterized by low levels of KCs and a remarkable invasion of MoMFs suggesting their potential role in phagoctosing necrotic hepatocytes, while opposite kinetics/distribution were observed during repair. During the early repair phase, yolksac - derived KCs were restored, whereas MoMFs diminished gradually then dissipated during late repair. MoMFs interacted with hepatic stellate cells during the necroinflammatory and early repair phases, potentially modulating their activation state and influencing their fibrogenic and pro-repair functions that are critical for wound healing. Altogether, our study reveals novel and distinct spatial and temporal distribution of KCs and MoMFs and provides insights into their complementary roles during acute liver injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207