Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir de las perspectivas ecosocialista y ecofeminista, este artículo examina el impacto negativo del extractivismo como una actividad económica que extrae una gran cantidad de recursos naturales, y evalúa cómo se ha desarrollado la gestión ecológica del capital global en América Central y América del Sur, lo cual se denomina “enverdecimiento”. Se abordan tres preguntas: ¿cómo se ha organizado la red regional y local sobre la gobernanza de la naturaleza en América Latina?; ¿por qué el extractivismo golpea más a las mujeres?; y ¿en qué medida y cómo se han involucrado los movimientos contra el extractivismo en la lucha contra las tendencias globales, así como en contra de las políticas nacionales y locales que las apoyan? El documento expone a las Naciones Unidas como una fuerza clave en el modelo permanente de colonialismo, dependencia económica, patriarcado y poder geopolítico que caracterizaal extractivismo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".