MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298192069 · doi:10.4000/ht.2179

D’un théâtre traditionnel clos à un théâtre populaire ouvert : le cas de Haïti

2012· article· fr· W4298192069 on OpenAlexaff
Joubert Satyre

Bibliographic record

VenueHorizons/Théâtre · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendant plus d’un siècle et demi, le théâtre haïtien se subdivisait en deux sous-genres, le drame historique ou patriotique et la comédie. Son esthétique, tributaire de la tradition française, par ses contraintes linguistiques et dramaturgiques en a fait un théâtre fermé aux potentialités théâtrales de la culture haïtienne. La revalorisation du créole et du vaudou par l’Indigénisme a débouché sur une nouvelle esthétique théâtrale, plus ouverte à ces potentialités. Les deux promoteurs de cette dramaturgie inspirée de la culture populaires sont Félix Morisseau-Leroy et Franck Fouché qui ont rompu avec un théâtre destiné à une petite élite pour s’adresser à au peuple haïtien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHorizons/ThéâtreSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207