MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298192228 · doi:10.1139/v02-005

Complexation of the La(III) cation by <i>p</i>-sulfonatocalix[4]arene A <sup>139</sup>La NMR study

2002· article· en· W4298192228 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yaël Israëli, Christine Bonal, Christian Detellier, Jean‐Pierre Morel, Nicole Morel‐Desrosiers

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCalixareneIsothermal microcalorimetryEnthalpyCrystallographyMoleculeNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyProton NMRLigand (biochemistry)StereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complexation of La(III) by the water-soluble p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene was thermodynamically characterized by 139 La NMR. The 139 La NMR data are consistent with the formation of a 1:1 complex resulting from electro static interactions between the sulfonato groups and La(III). The complexation is entropy-driven and is characterized by a positive standard enthalpy (Δ r H° = 11.0 ± 0.5 kJ mol –1 ) and a positive standard entropy (Δ r S° = 108 ± 2 J K –1 mol –1 ), which are in very good agreement with the ones determined previously by microcalorimetry. The linear relationship between the 139 La NMR linewidth of the free and of the complexed cation, obtained at temperatures ranging from 290 to 340 K, excludes the formation of complexes or aggregates other than the 1:1 complex. It shows also that upon complexation, the effective radius of La(III) undergoes an increase of 50%, related to the replacement of water molecules of the hydrated cation by sulfonato groups of the ligand.Key words: complexation, water-soluble calixarene, p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene, 139 La NMR, lanthanum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207