THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF REFRIGERANT MIXTURES IN VAPOR COMPRESSION REFRIGERATION SYSTEM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, performance analysis of vapor-compression refrigeration system with suction/liquid line heat exchanger has been realized with the calculations of the coefficient of performance, and volumetric refrigeration capacity values using different refrigerant mixtures. Refrigerants R12, R22, and R502 of CFCs, R134a, R152a, R125, R143a, and R32 of HFCs, R600a, and R290 of HCs, and their binary, ternary, and mixtures of different mass ratios have been used as working fluids. In order to decrease global pollution due to CFCs in accordance with Montreal Protocol in 1987, it is considered to use the refrigerant mixtures of HFCs, and HCs instead of CFCs (R12, R22, and R502). For this reason, the performance comparison of the new mixtures with CFC refrigerants has been done in the frame of this study. To compare the performance values, constant temperature method has been used. Thermodynamic properties of refrigerants that were used in the performance calculations have been taken from REFPROP 6.01. For this aim, new software has written in FORTRAN programing language using sub-programs of REFPROP, and all related calculations of performance have been achieved by this software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it