MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298334514 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1402.0090

The martingale approach after Varadhan and Dolgopyat

2014· preprint· en· W4298334514 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jacopo De Simoi, Carlangelo Liverani

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMartingale (probability theory)MathematicsLocal martingaleMathematical economicsDynamical systems theoryMartingale pricingSimple (philosophy)Calculus (dental)Applied mathematicsPure mathematicsEpistemologyPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present, in the simplest possible form, the so called martingale problem strategy to establish limit theorems. The presentation is specially adapted to problems arising in partially hyperbolic dynamical systems. We will discuss a simple partially hyperbolic example with fast-slow variables and use the martingale method to prove an averaging theorem and study fluctuations from the average. The emphasis is on ideas rather than on results. Also, no effort whatsoever is done to review the vast literature of the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicStability and Controllability of Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207