MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298383635 · doi:10.5957/icetech-2014-162

Use of Thermal Imagery to Assess Temperature Variation in Ice Collision Processes

2014· article· en· W4298383635 on OpenAlexaff
Jochen N.W. Tijsen, Stephen Bruneau, Bruce Colbourne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollisionThermalInternal frictionLead (geology)GeologyFriction coefficientMechanicsMeteorologyComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper describes the exploratory use of thermal imagery on ice collisional processes. This way of measuring provides a new source of information which may lead to new insights and improvements of existing ice collision models. Results indicate significant internal temperature rises in both the crushing case and in the sliding (friction) case. The paper provides some observations, however the main purpose is to show the value of applying thermal imagery in studies of collisional processes. Nevertheless the reader may be interested in the observations originating from the experiments. The first is that the internal temperature increments during ice friction are shown to track the trends in the friction coefficient. The second is that internal temperature increments during ice crushing appear to be concentrated in specific areas of the contact zone and may indicate high pressure zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207