MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Удосконалення системи магістерської підготовки перекладачів у ВНЗ України на основі прогресивного досвіду Канади

2014· article· uk· W4298406420 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Юлія Головацька

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUkraine: War, Education, Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

У статті розглянуто основні напрямки, за якими слід здійснювати реформування та вдосконалення перекладацької освіти в Україні. Визначено та обґрунтовано позитивні аспекти канадського досвіду підготовки магістрів перекладу для вітчизняної системи вищої освіти.В статье рассмотрены основные направления, по которым следует осуществлять реформирование и совершенствование переводческого образования в Украине. Определены и обоснованы позитивные аспекты канадского опыта подготовки магистров перевода для отечественной системы высшего образования.The paper reveals main ways according to which the reformation and improvement of ukrainian translators’ education should be accomplished. Positive aspects of Canadian experience of training translators on master’s degree level which can be implemented to the national system of higher education are defined and motivated. Studying of progressive Canadian experience of training translators/interpreters on master’s degree level and investigation of the given problem in Ukraine gives an opportunity to define the following ways of its reformation and improvement. It is decided that the first step to the improvement of national translators’ education is ordering of legislation in the sphere of higher education. In this context great attention should be paid to the financing of higher education and its decentralization. Translators’ training should respond to the demands of labor market. In order to reach this aim a constant monitoring is to be held in translation sphere by professional organization. It is defined that improving of organization of master’s degree translators’ training can be realized in the following ways: specialization of training programs which includes differentiation in training translators and interpreters and also thematic specialization according to the spheres of activity (economics, medicine, law, business etc.); regular renewal of educational programs through the involvement of experienced translators and interpreters; improvement of the content of master’s degree training programs which can be realized through the ordering of compulsory courses, increasing of optional ones, diversification of forms of translators/interpreters training, implementation of special approaches of translators/interpreters training, intensive use of informational technologies, improvement of practical training, intensive use of interactive forms of teaching, improvement of accreditation and certification systems of master’s degree programs and specialists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogySame topicUkraine: War, Education, HealthFrench-language works237,207