MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298407679 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1011.2235

Multiscale Gossip for Efficient Decentralized Averaging in Wireless\n Packet Networks

2010· preprint· W4298407679 on OpenAlexaff
Konstantinos I. Tsianos, Michael Rabbat

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2010
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGossipBinary logarithmHierarchyComputer scienceDe Bruijn sequenceScalingNetwork packetKey (lock)Wireless networkGossip protocolScale (ratio)Theoretical computer scienceState (computer science)Distributed algorithmMathematicsWirelessDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmDistributed computingComputer networkGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes and analyzes a hierarchical gossip algorithm for solving\nthe distributed average consensus problem in wireless sensor networks. The\nnetwork is recursively partitioned into subnetworks. Initially, nodes at the\nfinest scale gossip to compute local averages. Then, using geographic routing\nto enable gossip between nodes that are not directly connected, these local\naverages are progressively fused up the hierarchy until the global average is\ncomputed. We show that the proposed hierarchical scheme with $k$ levels of\nhierarchy is competitive with state-of-the-art randomized gossip algorithms, in\nterms of message complexity, achieving $\\epsilon$-accuracy with high\nprobability after $O\\big(n \\log \\log n \\log \\frac{kn}{\\epsilon} \\big)$\nmessages. Key to our analysis is the way in which the network is recursively\npartitioned. We find that the optimal scaling law is achieved when subnetworks\nat scale $j$ contain $O(n^{(2/3)^j})$ nodes; then the message complexity at any\nindividual scale is $O(n \\log \\frac{kn}{\\epsilon})$, and the total number of\nscales in the hierarchy grows slowly, as $\\Theta(\\log \\log n)$. Another\nimportant consequence of hierarchical construction is that the longest distance\nover which messages are exchanged is $O(n^{1/3})$ hops (at the highest scale),\nand most messages (at lower scales) travel shorter distances. In networks that\nuse link-level acknowledgements, this results in less congestion and resource\nusage by reducing message retransmissions. Simulations illustrate that the\nproposed scheme is more message-efficient than existing state-of-the-art\nrandomized gossip algorithms based on averaging along paths.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207