MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298411089 · doi:10.4000/articulo.635

« Que nous disent nos espions ? » L’héritage contemporain de la CIA

2008· article· fr· W4298411089 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Walther

Bibliographic record

VenueArticulo – revue de sciences humaines · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« La géographie, ça sert d’abord à faire la guerre » affirmait le géographe Yves Lacoste en 1976. Il montrait alors de quelle manière la maîtrise de l’espace pouvait également servir à l’exercice du pouvoir et l’impossibilité de séparer radicalement la pensée académique de celle des états-majors. Il n’y a sans doute pas de meilleure illustration contemporaine de ce principe que le dernier ouvrage consacré à la CIA par Tim Weiner, journaliste au New York Times. Car Legacy of Ashes est assuréme...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.037
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArticulo – revue de sciences humainesSame topicCommunism, Protests, Social MovementsFrench-language works237,207