MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298423140 · doi:10.17615/ktmt-6886

HOXB13 is a susceptibility gene for prostate cancer: results from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG)

2021· article· en· W4298423140 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Henrik Grönberg, Kimberly A. Zuhlke, Nicola J. Camp, Zsofia Kote‐Jarai, Lingyi Lu, Nancy Hamel, Walther Vogel, Elisa M. Ledet, Melissa S. DeRycke, Rosalind A. Eeles, Tiina Wahlfors, Shannon K. McDonnell, John L. Hopper, John D. Carpten, Janet L. Stanford, Chih Lin Hsieh, Fredrik Wiklund, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Kathleen A. Cooney, Elaine A. Ostrander, Lisa Cannon‐Albright, Patrick C. Walsh, Alice S. Whittemore, William D. Foulkes, Zhong Wang, Graham G. Giles, Teuvo L.J. Tammela, Manuel Luedeke, Joan E. Bailey‐Wilson, Ethan M. Lange, Doug Easton, Olivier Cussenot, Kathleen E. Wiley, Pål Møller, Christiane Maier, Daniel J. Schaid, Lovise Mahle, Diptasri Mandal, Sarah D. Isaacs, Siqun L. Zheng, Johanna Schleutker, Isaac J. Powell, Anna M. Johnson, William B. Isaacs, Jianfeng Xu, Daniela Seminara, Gianluca Severi, Géraldine Cancel‐Tassin, Craig C. Teerlink, William J. Catàlona

Bibliographic record

VenueUNC Libraries · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Human Genome Research InstituteMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthUniversität UlmTechnische Universität MünchenCancer Council VictoriaCancerfondenNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Health and Medical Research CouncilPirkanmaan SairaanhoitopiiriCancer Research UKCenters for Disease Control and PreventionTampereen YliopistoRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustHuntsman Cancer InstituteEuropean CommissionUniversité LavalNorthwestern UniversityFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
KeywordsProstate cancerGeneticsOncologyMedicineCancerBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prostate cancer has a strong familial component but uncovering the molecular basis for inherited susceptibility for this disease has been challenging. Recently, a rare, recurrent mutation (G84E) in HOXB13 was reported to be associated with prostate cancer risk. Confirmation and characterization of this finding is necessary to potentially translate this information to the clinic. To examine this finding in a large international sample of prostate cancer families, we genotyped this mutation and 14 other SNPs in or flanking HOXB13 in 2,443 prostate cancer families recruited by the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG). At least one mutation carrier was found in 112 prostate cancer families (4.6%), all of European descent. Within carrier families, the G84E mutation was more common in men with a diagnosis of prostate cancer (194 of 382, 51%) than those without (42 of 137, 30%), P=9.9×10−8 [odds ratio 4.42 (95% confidence interval 2.56–7.64)]. A family-based association test found G84E to be significantly over-transmitted from parents to affected offspring (P=6.5×10−6). Analysis of markers flanking the G84E mutation indicates that it resides in the same haplotype in 95% of carriers, consistent with a founder effect. Clinical characteristics of cancers in mutation carriers included features of high-risk disease. These findings demonstrate that the HOXB13 G84E mutation is present in ~5% of prostate cancer families, predominantly of European descent, and confirm its association with prostate cancer risk. While future studies are needed to more fully define the clinical utility of this observation, this allele and others like it could form the basis for early, targeted screening of men at elevated risk for this common, clinically heterogeneous cancer.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00439-012-1229-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNC LibrariesSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207