L’innovation agricole et agroalimentaire au XXIe siècle : maintien, effacement ou renouvellement de ses spécificités ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le chapitre analyse les caractéristiques actuelles des innovations dans l’agriculture et l’agroalimentaire, en questionnant la nature et l’évolution de leurs spécificités sectorielles. Malgré la globalisation, ces innovations conservent des traits spécifiques liés aux rapports qu’entretiennent les activités agricoles ou alimentaires avec la nature, l’espace et leurs sociétés. Cette spécificité résulte aussi de configurations historiques d’acteurs, d’institutions et de connaissances qui orientent l’innovation et constituent des systèmes d’innovation agricole. Mais les innovations agricoles ou agroalimentaires sont surtout marquées aujourd’hui par la convergence d’enjeux globaux que pointent les travaux sur les transitions, qu’elles soient écologique, climatique, énergétique, numérique, sociale ou alimentaire. Les spécificités des innovations agricoles ou agroalimentaires se renouvellent dans les transitions en cours, mais leur évolution future dépend de la confrontation entre différents modèles de production, d’échange et de consommation alimentaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".