MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298674944

L’innovation agricole et agroalimentaire au XXIe siècle : maintien, effacement ou renouvellement de ses spécificités ?

2018· preprint· fr· W4298674944 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jean-Marc Touzard

Bibliographic record

VenueProdinra (INRA Bordeaux-Aquitaine) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le chapitre analyse les caractéristiques actuelles des innovations dans l’agriculture et l’agroalimentaire, en questionnant la nature et l’évolution de leurs spécificités sectorielles. Malgré la globalisation, ces innovations conservent des traits spécifiques liés aux rapports qu’entretiennent les activités agricoles ou alimentaires avec la nature, l’espace et leurs sociétés. Cette spécificité résulte aussi de configurations historiques d’acteurs, d’institutions et de connaissances qui orientent l’innovation et constituent des systèmes d’innovation agricole. Mais les innovations agricoles ou agroalimentaires sont surtout marquées aujourd’hui par la convergence d’enjeux globaux que pointent les travaux sur les transitions, qu’elles soient écologique, climatique, énergétique, numérique, sociale ou alimentaire. Les spécificités des innovations agricoles ou agroalimentaires se renouvellent dans les transitions en cours, mais leur évolution future dépend de la confrontation entre différents modèles de production, d’échange et de consommation alimentaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProdinra (INRA Bordeaux-Aquitaine)Same topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207