MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298842372 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0910.5936

Convexity properties of the condition number II

2009· preprint· en· W4298842372 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Carlos Beltrán, Jean‐Pierre Dedieu, Gregorio Malajovich, M. Shub

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2009
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversitat de BarcelonaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsMathematicsHessian matrixPure mathematicsRank (graph theory)GeodesicConvexityLipschitz continuityConvex functionMatrix (chemical analysis)Mathematical analysisRegular polygonCombinatoricsApplied mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our previous paper [SIMAX 31 n.3 1491-1506(2010)], we studied the condition metric in the space of maximal rank matrices. Here, we show that this condition metric induces a Lipschitz-Riemann structure on that space. After investigating geodesics in such a nonsmooth structure, we show that the inverse of the smallest singular value of a matrix is a log-convex function along geodesics (Theorem 1). We also show that a similar result holds for the solution variety of linear systems (Theorem 31). Some of our intermediate results, such as Theorem 12, on the second covariant derivative or Hessian of a function with symmetries on a manifold, and Theorem 29 on piecewise self-convex functions, are of independent interest. Those results were motivated by our investigations on the com- plexity of path-following algorithms for solving polynomial systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.093 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207