Selección de rizobios adaptados a ecosistemas ganaderos de Alberta, Canadá, inoculados en maíz (Zea mays, L.).: Fase I: invernadero Selection of rhizobia adapted to livestock production ecosystems from Alberta, Canada, inoculated in corn (Zea mays, L.).: Stage I: greenhouse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se efectuó un ensayo en invernadero con el objetivo de seleccionar cepas de rizobio inoculadas en maíz (Zea mays, L.), para lo cual se utilizaron 16 cepas nativas canadienses de Sinorhizobium meliloti, así como 12 cepas comerciales, pertenecientes a diferentes géneros y especies de rizobio. Los inóculos se confeccionaron en medio CLM y fueron agitados hasta alcanzar un título de 10(6)-10(8) cél./mL. Se evaluaron las variables: peso seco aéreo (PSA), peso seco raíz (PSR) y longitud del tallo (LT). Se constató que en todas las variables existieron tratamientos inoculados que fueron estadísticamente superiores al control absoluto. En el PSA dos tratamientos no difirieron significativamente del control fertilizado; mientras que sólo cuatro tratamientos inoculados en LT y cinco en PSR fueron estadísticamente inferiores al control fertilizado. La agrupación en conglomerados permitió seleccionar las cepas CAC8, CAC9, CAC17 y CAC17a, para su posterior evaluación en condiciones de campo. El 100% de los tratamientos seleccionados en el dendrograma fueron inoculados con cepas nativas. Al evaluar los tratamientos en cuanto al nivel de dependencia del PSA y la LT con respecto al PSR, se observó una regresión fuerte del PSA en los inoculados con cepas nativas, y débil en los inoculados con cepas comerciales, así como en los controles. La regresión fue débil en la LT en todos los tratamientos. Se recomienda la continuación de estas investigaciones en condiciones de campo, además de otros estudios más profundos. A greenhouse experiment was conducted in order to select rhizobium strains inoculated on corn (Zea mays, L.), for which 16 Canadian native strains of Sinorhizobium meliloti, as well as 12 commercial strains, belonging to different rhizobium genera and species, were used. The inoculi were prepared in BYM medium and shaken to obtain a titer of 10(6)-10(8) cells/mL.. The variables evaluated were: aerial dry weight (ADW), root dry weight (RDW) and stem length (SL). In all the variables some inoculated treatments were observed to be statistically higher than the absolute control. In ADW two treatments did not differ significantly from the fertilized control; while only four inoculated treatments in SL and five in RDW were statistically lower than the fertilized control. Cluster analysis allowed to select the strains CAC8, CAC9, CAC17 and CAC17a, for their later evaluation under field conditions. One hundred percent of the treatments selected in the dendrogram were inoculated with native strains. When evaluating the treatments regarding the level of dependence of ADW and SL with regards to RDW, a strong regression of ADW was observed in the ones inoculated with native strains, and a weak regression in the treatments inoculated with commercial strains. The regression was weak in SL for all treatments. To continue this research under field conditions, in addition to further studies, is recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".