MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299416416 · doi:10.7202/1087917ar

“Like King and Queen, Like Balinese and Sasak”

2001· article· en· W4299416416 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Harnish

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnologies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceQueen (butterfly)NarrativeWorshipMythologyHinduismPerforming artsEthnic groupHistoryGender studiesSociologyArtVisual artsAnthropologyLiteratureReligious studiesTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lingsar temple pujawali, a primarily religious festival on the island of Lombok in Indonesia, conjoins Hindu Balinese migrants and local Muslim Sasak to worship together for rain and spring water, fertility, bountiful harvests, and cures and boons. This article explores the narrative elements of the presented music at the festival, and posits that performances, which structure and frame the event and its internal rites, are embodied narratives linked to myths, fertility, and moral orders. The performing arts at Lingsar also erect ethnicity and unify together the respective groups of Balinese and Sasak. This union, referred to as “like king and queen,” is generated through music and dance performance in conjunction with the rites of priests and the collective actions of participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnologiesSame topicAsian Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207