MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299422367 · doi:10.5957/icetech-2006-147

TEMPSC Trials in the Northumberland Strait

2006· article· en· W4299422367 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Kendrick, Gareth Igloliorte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNavyCoast guardSoftware deploymentSubmarine pipelineScheduleAeronauticsOceanographyEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEngineeringEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the project undertaken by BMT Fleet Technology Limited (BMT FTL) on behalf of a Joint Industry Partnership (JIP) to test a Totally Enclosed, Motor Propelled Survival Craft (TEMPSC) in ice conditions and to provide a detailed analysis of its survivability. Two partners, ExxonMobil and Sakhalin Energy Investment Company (SEIC) are currently developing oil and gas fields off Sakhalin Island in the Sea of Okhotsk. Agip KCO is the operator of developments in the Northern Caspian Sea. Transport Canada has regulatory responsibilities for the safety of ships and offshore platforms in Canadian waters (and for Canadian flag ships worldwide). Ice is a major factor in all of these areas, though its duration and severity varies. Evacuation into ice therefore becomes a major safety issue for all of the project sponsors. The core of the project was the deployment of an instrumented TEMPSC into the Northumberland Strait between the mainland of Canada and Prince Edward Island during March 2003. This would not have been possible without the support of the Canadian Coast Guard, who provided icebreaker, helicopter and base support services. This paper presents the background to the project and its objectives. It provides a description of the TEMPSC used in the trials, and of the instrumentation that was fitted to record its performance. It describes the trials that were planned, and those that were actually undertaken, explaining the differences. A summary of key findings and their safety implications are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207