MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4299427606 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425505

Messier 35 (NGC 2168) DANCe

2015· article· en· W4299427606 on OpenAlexfundno aff
H. Bouy, E. Bertin, D. Barrado, L. M. Sarro, J. Olivares, E. Moraux, J. Bouvier, Jean‐Charles Cuillandre, Álvaro Ribas, Y. Beletsky

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Naval ObservatoryInstitut national des sciences de l'UniversCanadian Space AgencyInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasFermilabMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of ChicagoCalifornia Institute of TechnologyU.S. Department of EnergyPrinceton UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityNational Science FoundationUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhotometry (optics)Proper motionPhysicsAstrophysicsCluster (spacecraft)Open clusterStatisticsAstronomyComputer scienceMathematicsStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Messier 35 (NGC 2168) is an important young nearby cluster. Its age, richness and relative proximity make it an ideal target for stellar evolution studies. The Kepler K2 mission recently observed it and provided a high accuracy photometric time series of a large number of sources in this area of the sky. Identifying the cluster’s members is therefore of high importance to optimize the interpretation and analysis of the Kepler K2 data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→