MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299474914

Syzygies among reduction operators

2017· preprint· en· W4299474914 on OpenAlexaff
Cyrille Chenavier

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Logic
Canadian institutionsPrevention of Organ Failure
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Computer scienceMathematicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce the notion of syzygy for a set of reduction operators and relate it to the notion of syzygy for presentations of algebras.We give a method for constructing a linear basis of the space of syzygies for a set of reduction operators.We interpret these syzygies in terms of the confluence property from rewriting theory.This enables us to optimise the completion procedure for reduction operators based on a criterion for detecting useless reductions.We illustrate this criterion with an example of construction of commutative Gröbner basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicAdvanced Algebra and LogicFrench-language works237,207